Popular Mechanics Aptera Typ-1e Testdrive

February 25th, 2010 Categories: Movies

Aptera’s Super-MPG Electric Typ-1 e: Exclusive Video Test Drive PM hits the streets and gets looked at more than ever before, then heads to the shop for first-look details on a futuristic car so efficient itll make your jaw drop. www.popularmechanics.com

Related Blogs

  • Related Blogs on Drive
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

25 Responses to “Popular Mechanics Aptera Typ-1e Testdrive”

  1. jonnyasprin
    February 25th, 2010 at 23:58
    1

    hahah he said step on the “gas” at 2:03

  2. KarenRei
    February 25th, 2010 at 23:58
    2

    @isomoye

    The DOE doesn’t have a habit of giving money to companies that don’t return investor calls for three months, are run by a guy who ran his previous two companies into the ground, and have a CFO who was charged by the SEC for cooking the books at Delphi.

  3. isomoye
    February 25th, 2010 at 23:58
    3

    Obama just made three wheels acceptable for the federal loan so yay aptera can now get the money they need

  4. idontcare80
    February 25th, 2010 at 23:58
    4

    I would love to have T-Rex, I’ve wanted one for years, but they are pretty expensive too. I do actually care quite a bit about the impact my life has on the environment, so I would want a pure EV for daily driving. I also care quite a bit about high performance cars so I would also love to have something fast and fun to drive on the weekend.

  5. 07SuperchargedSS
    February 25th, 2010 at 23:58
    5

    well if u want this thing but in a much better form, go buy a T-Rex. same concept only faster and better looking. not so environmentally friendly, but you wont care because people will stare at you with envy, and because your name says so.

  6. 07SuperchargedSS
    February 25th, 2010 at 23:58
    6

    go ahead and keep laughing dipshit. just because i think its ugly doesnt mean its a dumb comment. i guarantee im a hell of a lot smarter than you are

  7. 07SuperchargedSS
    February 25th, 2010 at 23:58
    7

    obviously. i wasn’t born yesterday. i dont think camry and fusion hybrids and priuses go for 80 grand, do they? all im saying is that this is butt ugly in my opinion and there are way better things to spend money on.

  8. idontcare80
    February 25th, 2010 at 23:58
    8

    The 2e is much better looking, though it would have been better looking if they didn’t make the back end so droopy.

  9. idontcare80
    February 25th, 2010 at 23:58
    9

    Not everyone can afford a $80,000+ or a $100,000+ car, the Aptera starts at around $25,000.

  10. brightstarone
    February 25th, 2010 at 23:58
    10

    You made a fool of yourself with more dumb comment’s. Keep it up stupid and I’ll keep laughing at you :D

  11. 07SuperchargedSS
    February 25th, 2010 at 23:58
    11

    @brightstarone not really. anyone who drives that crap will make a fool of themselves. theres better things to drive and save the environment at the same time. tesla roadster, fisker karma, hell even a ford fusion hybrid is a million times better than this thing. so eat me

  12. brightstarone
    February 25th, 2010 at 23:58
    12

    You made a fool of yourself, ass-hole.

  13. 07SuperchargedSS
    February 25th, 2010 at 23:58
    13

    well anyone who is willing to climb into something that looks like sperm with 3 wheels must be serious about saving the environment. maybe u can park it up a fat chicks ass

  14. obatopaye
    February 25th, 2010 at 23:58
    14

    This makes for a great flight vehicar.

    I don’t see how this car can work on the expressway safely.

  15. silverbird58
    February 25th, 2010 at 23:58
    15

    yes

  16. silverbird58
    February 25th, 2010 at 23:58
    16

    i dont think its loud inside its high off the ground and can be seen unlike karma
    or tesla. and since its off the ground
    lets assume the bottom isnt one big sounding board . i cralled out of my freinds countach it was so niosey inside
    you couldnt heare the radio at any volume level i’d like a electric version
    and if i get tired ill shove in a 35hp disel

  17. lakerfan82k3
    February 25th, 2010 at 23:58
    17

    I like it other than the fact that every time they showed the cockpit view it sounded like it was loud as Hell inside.

  18. niswel
    February 25th, 2010 at 23:58
    18

    Nice to see an American car, that I actually want to buy! Mustang? Camaro? Challager? Escalade? Such a waste of resources!

  19. vladimir2277
    February 25th, 2010 at 23:58
    19

    so, who wants to pop a hayabusa engine in there!!!???

  20. drumzstix666
    February 25th, 2010 at 23:58
    20

    yea really confusing eh? – at 90 honestly its really scary, but i’ve only done it twice on a nearby track, 90kph on city streets is nearly impossible, yea man i definetely wanna but i’m savin up for a descent camera first.

  21. Kallenator1988
    February 25th, 2010 at 23:58
    21

    Ah, I made a mistake there, this new youtube design confuses me, thought it was your videos :p
    Wow, 90 on the flats is insane! How does that feel?
    You need to upload a video of your modified WAW ;)

  22. drumzstix666
    February 25th, 2010 at 23:58
    22

    on my channel is like mine, mine is silver
    2 seperate seats, 2 seperate people – cost me $2,000 to custom make and install the second seat – 45 is right, though my average is 50kph, saying 90kph is using all strength and sweat lasting 20 min – velos can have seat belts, shell from carbon fibre, velos have flags for visibility, can wear a helmet, velos are slower than cars – but at second though maybe ur right

  23. Kallenator1988
    February 25th, 2010 at 23:58
    23

    I looked at your channel, I know ;)
    1 seat front and back? You mean just one seat right?
    Oh, that expensive, well yeah the production numbers are a great downside.
    I have both read and heard from many sides that 45kph is about maximum you can do on a flat surface without using all your strength. Downhill is completely different matter =)
    It’s not arguable, it is safer.. seat belts, impact beams, higher seated position, airbags and it’s far more visible to other traffic. What’s the trunk volume?

  24. drumzstix666
    February 25th, 2010 at 23:58
    24

    the velomobile i have is the WAW

  25. drumzstix666
    February 25th, 2010 at 23:58
    25

    Dude, chill. That’s cool. I have 1 seat front and back.enough trunk space for me. I can only go up to 90kph (rarely), 100kph downhill max, heating (wear warm clothes), cooling (open window), 180 degree view front, rear view mirrors on both sides for rear visability like a car, safer? more or less, its arguable. to buy it was $10k CAN, now $18k CAN from investments. The reason why Velos cost so much is because of little production. If people buy more Velos price goes down.

Comments are closed.